Question Description

Case Scenario

Marion Pham is a nurse of Vietnamese ancestry. The staff of the ward in which she has worked for many years at the Astral Hospital Center is very culturally diverse. Although no one has ever demonstrated overt hostility toward her because of her race or color, she has noticed that over the years, it is usually the Asian employees who are made the brunt of practical jokes or ridiculed. At one time or another, she has observed just about every employee on the ward, including other Asian staff members, as well as the head nurse, engage in such behavior. Each time this happens, Marion experiences a strong sense of hurt and ostracism. Otherwise, everyone on the ward is helpful and courteous to her and she is frequently asked to participate in off-work social activities with coworkers.

Your team is to analyze the case presented much like the cases submitted via Turnitin. Instead of developing a written paper, your team is to develop a presentation covering all of the elements that would have been covered in a research paper. Sources must be properly cited, and at least two sources other than the textbook must be used to include outside court cases. The final slide of your presentation should list your references in APA format. Each team member must narrate the slides he/she contributed to the presentation. The team will receive one grade for the assignment. There are 5 sections that will be listed in the powerpoint: Assumptions, Analysis, Plaintiff Case, Defendant Case and Management Tips.

Team Assignment Rubric

Team Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisA thorough analysis was discussed to include applying the legal principles and incorporating research.

40.0 pts

Excellent

The analysis used the correct legal principles and applied them correctly. Appropriate assumptions were stated to provide context to the argument made. Outside research was used to support the argument.

30.0 pts

Good

The analysis used the correct legal principles for the most part and applied them correctly. Appropriate assumptions were stated to provide context to the arguments made. Outside research was used to support the argument.

20.0 pts

Fair

The analysis did not thoroughly demonstrate the use of legal principles and/or did not consistently apply them correctly. Outside research did not thoroughly support the argument.

10.0 pts

Poor

The correct legal principle was not used or was poorly applied. Assumptions were not clearly stated or accurately applied. Outside research was not used to support the argument.

0.0 pts

Not attempted

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement TipsA thorough set of management tips were provided to include dealing with the current situation and preventing similar issues in the future.

30.0 pts

Excellent

Management tips addressed the situation and provided recommendations for preventing similar situations in the future.

23.0 pts

Good

Management tips addressed the situation and provided recommendations for preventing similar situations in the future for the most part.

15.0 pts

Fair

Management tips did not address the situation or did not provide recommendations for preventing similar situations in the future.

8.0 pts

Poor

Management tips did not thoroughly address the situation or provide recommendations for preventing similar situations in the future.

0.0 pts

Not attempted

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormattingFollows the requirements related to format and APA.

10.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly follows the requirements related to format and APA.

8.0 pts

Good

Follows, for the most part, the requirements related to format and APA.

5.0 pts

Fair

Does not consistently follow the requirements related to format and APA.

3.0 pts

Poor

Poorly follows the requirements related to format and APA.

0.0 pts

Not attempted

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesScholarly level of references, how effective references are used, soundness of references.

10.0 pts

Excellent

All references used are of good/scholarly quality. There is a minimum of two scholarly references to include outside court cases, and they are used effectively.

8.0 pts

Good

Most references used are of good/scholarly quality. There is a minimum of two scholarly references to include outside court cases, and they are used effectively.

5.0 pts

Fair

Some references used are of good/scholarly quality. There is a not minimum of two scholarly references to include outside court cases, and/or they are not used effectively.

3.0 pts

Poor

Most references used are not of good/scholarly quality. There is not a minimum of two scholarly references to include outside court cases, and they are not used effectively.

0.0 pts

Not attempted

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation QualityA thorough presentation was delivered in a logical manner presenting main points without reading the full text from slides.

10.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation was delivered in a logical manner presenting main points without reading the full text from slides.

8.0 pts

Good

The presentation was mostly delivered in a logical manner presenting main points usually without reading the full text from slides.

5.0 pts

Fair

The presentation was not fully delivered in a logical manner presenting main points. Some slides were presented by reading the slide text to the viewer.

3.0 pts

Poor

The presentation was not delivered in a logical manner, and/or slides were often presented by reading the slide text to the viewer.

0.0 pts

Not attempted

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.
Tags: case study powerpoint human resource management Troy University HRM6635

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *